<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two birds with one stone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lowerfootprint.com/two-birds-with-one-stone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lowerfootprint.com/two-birds-with-one-stone/</link>
	<description>Information on lowering carbon footprints and the Green Agenda by Tom Raftery</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://lowerfootprint.com/two-birds-with-one-stone/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lowerfootprint.com/two-birds-with-one-stone/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>That sounds great!  If Los Alamos could produce even a small-scale proof-of-concept model, I'm sure that several major energy companies across the world would be willing to fund and commit to eventually adopting the technology in a heartbeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds great!  If Los Alamos could produce even a small-scale proof-of-concept model, I&#8217;m sure that several major energy companies across the world would be willing to fund and commit to eventually adopting the technology in a heartbeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
